Conference Proceeding

Mathematics in Space and Applied Sciences (ICMSAS-2023)
ICMSAS-2023

Subject Area: Mathematics
Pages: 331
Published On: 03-Mar-2023
Online Since: 04-Mar-2023

 Read More >>

Author(s): Suresh C. Jaryal, Ayan Chatterjee

Email(s): suresh.fifthd@gmail.com , ayan.theory@gmail.com

Address: Suresh C. Jaryal #1, 2 , Ayan Chatterjee†1
1Department of Physics and Astronomical Science, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Dharamshala 176215, India
2Department of Physics and Astronomical Sciences, Central University of Jammu, Samba, J&K 181143, India
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Conference Proceeding, Mathematics in Space and Applied Sciences (ICMSAS-2023)

Year of Publication:  March, 2023

Online since:  March 04, 2023

DOI:




Marginally Trapped Surfaces in 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory

 

Suresh C. Jaryal #1, 2 , Ayan Chatterjee†1

1Department of Physics and Astronomical Science, Central University of Himachal Pradesh,

Dharamshala 176215, India

2Department of Physics and Astronomical Sciences, Central University of Jammu,

Samba, J&K 181143, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: suresh.fifthd@gmail.com, ayan.theory@gmail.com

 

Abstract:

We investigate the formation and evolution of horizons during gravitational collapse of dust matter in 4D Einstein- Gauss- Bonnet gravity. The singularity forms as the end state of the collapse and depending on time formation of these horizons/ marginally trapped surfaces (MTT), the collapse leads to either a black hole or a massive naked singularity. The effects of the GB coupling parameter ( ) and the Misner- Sharp mass function F( ) on the formation of MTT and time of formation of central singularity are investigated. Our results show that the relationship between GB coupling parameter ( ) and the Misner- Sharp mass function F( ) determines the end state of collapse to be either black hole or naked singularity. We find that, if  , there are no trapped surfaces/ MTT on the initial Cauchy hypersurface and the central singularity if massive and naked. However, for F( ) ≥ 2  , central singularity is always hidden/ censored by marginally trapped surface of topology  which eventually becomes null and coincides with the event horizon at equilibrium. We validated these results for various matter density profiles using analytic and numerical techniques.

 

Keywords: Alternative theory of gravity, Classical black holes, Naked singularity.

 

I. INTRODUCTION:

Einstein's general theory of relativity (GR) is the foundation for our understanding of both small- and large-scale gravitational phenomena [1, 2]. Although GR has been empirically proven to be accurate and predictive, its modifications still draw attention [3, 6]. Nowadays, there are many theories of gravity that are alternatives to Einstein’s theory [7, 8]. Among these modified theories, we shall study a effective and natural generalization of GR to  dimensions [9, 10]. This extended theory has certain unique qualities with higher derivative terms among the wide class of generic higher order curvature theories. Nevertheless, this alternate theory's field equations are second-order, much like those in the general theory of relativity. The EGB gravity, also known as quadratic order Lovelock theory, allows us to investigate how higher curvature corrections to blackhole physics significantly alter the qualitative features available due to black holes in the context of general relativity. Boulware and Deser's discovery of the spherically symmetric static solution in the EGB theory [11] led to the generalisation of the D-dimensional Scwarzschild- Tangherlini black hole [12].

 

In four dimensions, the GB Lagrangian is known to be a total derivate and hence, it does not contribute to the equations of motion. This implies that the usual limit to 4d does not exist at field equations level and violates the Lovelock theorems. However, it was recently suggested that this violation of the Lovelock theorems can be avoided, if one rescale the Gauss- Bonnet coupling constant  then it is possible that variation of the GB action can result into a non trivial 4-dimensional limit of GB theory [13]. There have been numerous attempts with dimensional reductions and/ or field re-definitions, and these efforts have produced some variants of the 4D model [14, 15]. Out of these, in this work, we have followed the dimensional reduction formalism as given by Lu and Pang [14].

 

This version of the 4D EGB theory's spherically symmetric horizon formation is of particular interest to us since it may shed light on issues pertaining to the cosmic censorship concept. In this work we will employ the formalism of trapped surfaces [16]. The fundamental of this formalism is that, when the matter cloud starts to collapse it will eventually led to the spacetime singularity and during this process trapped surfaces will emerge. In these trapped surfaces, the null rays orthogonal to the closed  surface have negative expansion. The boundary of these trapped regions is a -dimensional surface foliated by -dimensional spheres and these surfaces are called trapped or untrapped corresponding to the respective value of expansion  to be less than or greater than respectively. On the boundary of these regions have negative ingoing expansion  and the vanishing of the outgoing expansion  and are called the marginally trapped spheres (MTS) and the cylinder foliated by MTS is called a marginally trapped tube (MTT) [17, 18].

 

In this work, we employ the MTT formalism to study the collapsing phenomena in the four dimensional EGB gravity. Our study shows that for the collapse of dustlike matter cloud, if the mass function  is less than that GB coupling constant  i.e.  , the MTT does not form on the initial Cauchy hypersurface, implying the spacetime singularity is massive and naked. However, for F( ) ≥ 2  , the spacetime singularity is always covered by non-central MTT,  and at equilibrium it eventually coincides with the event horizon. We validated our results for various matter density profiles using analytic and numerical techniques [17, 18].

 

II. Action, Field Equations and Solution:

Einstein- Gauss- Bonnet (EGB) theory of gravity is a natural generalization of the GR. The D-dimensional EGB gravity has the following the following Lagrangian functional [9,10,17]:

                                                                                                     (1)

where , ,  and  are Ricci scalar, D- dimensional GB constant, cosmological constant and Lagrangian of the matter field , respectively,  is the GB functional in D- dimensions with the tensor field  .

The line element of spherically symmetric distribution of collapsing dust like matter cloud is

 ,                                                           (2)

The energy momentum of the dustlike matter cloud is given by

 ,                                                                                                                                                                 (3)

where  is the unit timelike four velocity vector satisfying =  −1 and  is the energy density.  The set of non zero EGB field equations takes the following form [17]:

,                                                                                                                                       (4)

 ,                                                                                                                                                                         (5)

 ,                                                                                                                                                                        (6)

                                                                                                                                    (7)

   ,                                                                                               (8)

where  is the Misner Sharp mass function and the functions  and  are defined as ;   . The collapsing scenario requires <0. By using these Eqns. (4)-(8), we find that ;  . The interior metric Eqn (2) becomes

                                                                            (9)

The choice of  stands for the marginally bund collapse when  and for bound and unbound collapse, when  is greater or less than zero, respectively. As stated earlier, MTT forms the boundary of black hole region. So, we'll utilise the MTT formulation to find horizons. The MTT formalism also has the advantage of allowing a direct examination of the horizon's growth process. For instance, as matter passes through, the MTT's radius grows. To study this formalism, let  is tangent to the MTT and depending upon the sign/ nature of the quantity , the corresponding   becomes null, spacelike or timelike. For the dustlike matter in EGB gravity, the form of  is given by [17]
  ,                                                                                                                                         (10)

where  represent the area of the MTT,  and  can be expressed in terms of the matter variables density and mass function [17, 18]. It is observed that , when there is no matter shells are falling and it shows that the MTT is null. When there are matter shells falling  becomes positive, implies that the MTT is spacelike [17].

 

III. Discussion of the Results:

In the present work, we consider different matter- density profiles to study the gravitational collapse of the dustlike matter cloud in 4D EGB theory of gravity. Our study presents quite interesting results which does not emerges in its counterpart theory i.e. 4D general relativity [17]. Our results shows that the formation of the trapped surfaces/ MTT are delayed until the mass  of the collapsing shell becomes equals to that of the   . The absence of the MTT/ trapped surfaces in the region   implies that the central spacetime singularity is massive and always naked in 4D EGB. As mass  equals  , the non central MTT begins to form and when , the MTT/ trapped surfaces covers the singularity. It is interesting

Marginally Trapped Surfaces in 4D Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Theory

 

Suresh C. Jaryal #1, 2 , Ayan Chatterjee†1

1Department of Physics and Astronomical Science, Central University of Himachal Pradesh,

Dharamshala 176215, India

2Department of Physics and Astronomical Sciences, Central University of Jammu,

Samba, J&K 181143, India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: suresh.fifthd@gmail.com, ayan.theory@gmail.com

 

Abstract:

We investigate the formation and evolution of horizons during gravitational collapse of dust matter in 4D Einstein- Gauss- Bonnet gravity. The singularity forms as the end state of the collapse and depending on time formation of these horizons/ marginally trapped surfaces (MTT), the collapse leads to either a black hole or a massive naked singularity. The effects of the GB coupling parameter ( ) and the Misner- Sharp mass function F( ) on the formation of MTT and time of formation of central singularity are investigated. Our results show that the relationship between GB coupling parameter ( ) and the Misner- Sharp mass function F( ) determines the end state of collapse to be either black hole or naked singularity. We find that, if  , there are no trapped surfaces/ MTT on the initial Cauchy hypersurface and the central singularity if massive and naked. However, for F( ) ≥ 2  , central singularity is always hidden/ censored by marginally trapped surface of topology  which eventually becomes null and coincides with the event horizon at equilibrium. We validated these results for various matter density profiles using analytic and numerical techniques.

 

Keywords: Alternative theory of gravity, Classical black holes, Naked singularity.

 

I. INTRODUCTION:

Einstein's general theory of relativity (GR) is the foundation for our understanding of both small- and large-scale gravitational phenomena [1, 2]. Although GR has been empirically proven to be accurate and predictive, its modifications still draw attention [3, 6]. Nowadays, there are many theories of gravity that are alternatives to Einstein’s theory [7, 8]. Among these modified theories, we shall study a effective and natural generalization of GR to  dimensions [9, 10]. This extended theory has certain unique qualities with higher derivative terms among the wide class of generic higher order curvature theories. Nevertheless, this alternate theory's field equations are second-order, much like those in the general theory of relativity. The EGB gravity, also known as quadratic order Lovelock theory, allows us to investigate how higher curvature corrections to blackhole physics significantly alter the qualitative features available due to black holes in the context of general relativity. Boulware and Deser's discovery of the spherically symmetric static solution in the EGB theory [11] led to the generalisation of the D-dimensional Scwarzschild- Tangherlini black hole [12].

 

In four dimensions, the GB Lagrangian is known to be a total derivate and hence, it does not contribute to the equations of motion. This implies that the usual limit to 4d does not exist at field equations level and violates the Lovelock theorems. However, it was recently suggested that this violation of the Lovelock theorems can be avoided, if one rescale the Gauss- Bonnet coupling constant  then it is possible that variation of the GB action can result into a non trivial 4-dimensional limit of GB theory [13]. There have been numerous attempts with dimensional reductions and/ or field re-definitions, and these efforts have produced some variants of the 4D model [14, 15]. Out of these, in this work, we have followed the dimensional reduction formalism as given by Lu and Pang [14].

 

This version of the 4D EGB theory's spherically symmetric horizon formation is of particular interest to us since it may shed light on issues pertaining to the cosmic censorship concept. In this work we will employ the formalism of trapped surfaces [16]. The fundamental of this formalism is that, when the matter cloud starts to collapse it will eventually led to the spacetime singularity and during this process trapped surfaces will emerge. In these trapped surfaces, the null rays orthogonal to the closed  surface have negative expansion. The boundary of these trapped regions is a -dimensional surface foliated by -dimensional spheres and these surfaces are called trapped or untrapped corresponding to the respective value of expansion  to be less than or greater than respectively. On the boundary of these regions have negative ingoing expansion  and the vanishing of the outgoing expansion  and are called the marginally trapped spheres (MTS) and the cylinder foliated by MTS is called a marginally trapped tube (MTT) [17, 18].

 

In this work, we employ the MTT formalism to study the collapsing phenomena in the four dimensional EGB gravity. Our study shows that for the collapse of dustlike matter cloud, if the mass function  is less than that GB coupling constant  i.e.  , the MTT does not form on the initial Cauchy hypersurface, implying the spacetime singularity is massive and naked. However, for F( ) ≥ 2  , the spacetime singularity is always covered by non-central MTT,  and at equilibrium it eventually coincides with the event horizon. We validated our results for various matter density profiles using analytic and numerical techniques [17, 18].

 

II. Action, Field Equations and Solution:

Einstein- Gauss- Bonnet (EGB) theory of gravity is a natural generalization of the GR. The D-dimensional EGB gravity has the following the following Lagrangian functional [9,10,17]:

                                                                                                     (1)

where , ,  and  are Ricci scalar, D- dimensional GB constant, cosmological constant and Lagrangian of the matter field , respectively,  is the GB functional in D- dimensions with the tensor field  .

The line element of spherically symmetric distribution of collapsing dust like matter cloud is

 ,                                                           (2)

The energy momentum of the dustlike matter cloud is given by

 ,                                                                                                                                                                 (3)

where  is the unit timelike four velocity vector satisfying =  −1 and  is the energy density.  The set of non zero EGB field equations takes the following form [17]:

,                                                                                                                                       (4)

 ,                                                                                                                                                                         (5)

 ,                                                                                                                                                                        (6)

                                                                                                                                    (7)

   ,                                                                                               (8)

where  is the Misner Sharp mass function and the functions  and  are defined as ;   . The collapsing scenario requires <0. By using these Eqns. (4)-(8), we find that ;  . The interior metric Eqn (2) becomes

                                                                            (9)

The choice of  stands for the marginally bund collapse when  and for bound and unbound collapse, when  is greater or less than zero, respectively. As stated earlier, MTT forms the boundary of black hole region. So, we'll utilise the MTT formulation to find horizons. The MTT formalism also has the advantage of allowing a direct examination of the horizon's growth process. For instance, as matter passes through, the MTT's radius grows. To study this formalism, let  is tangent to the MTT and depending upon the sign/ nature of the quantity , the corresponding   becomes null, spacelike or timelike. For the dustlike matter in EGB gravity, the form of  is given by [17]
  ,                                                                                                                                         (10)

where  represent the area of the MTT,  and  can be expressed in terms of the matter variables density and mass function [17, 18]. It is observed that , when there is no matter shells are falling and it shows that the MTT is null. When there are matter shells falling  becomes positive, implies that the MTT is spacelike [17].

 

III. Discussion of the Results:

In the present work, we consider different matter- density profiles to study the gravitational collapse of the dustlike matter cloud in 4D EGB theory of gravity. Our study presents quite interesting results which does not emerges in its counterpart theory i.e. 4D general relativity [17]. Our results shows that the formation of the trapped surfaces/ MTT are delayed until the mass  of the collapsing shell becomes equals to that of the   . The absence of the MTT/ trapped surfaces in the region   implies that the central spacetime singularity is massive and always naked in 4D EGB. As mass  equals  , the non central MTT begins to form and when , the MTT/ trapped surfaces covers the singularity. It is interesting




REFERENCES:

1.              S. W. Hawking, and G. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1975.

2.              Robert M. Wald, General Relativity. University of Chicago Press, 1984.

3.              P. S. Joshi, Gravitational Collapse and Spacetime Singularities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2007.

4.              R. M. Wald, Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics, Chicago Lectures in Physics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 10, 1995.

5.              I. Buchbinder, S. Odintsov and I. Shapiro, Effective action in quantum gravity. IOP, Bristol, UK, 1992.

6.              M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, Quantum Gravity and the Functional Renormalization Group: The Road towards Asymptotic Safety. Cambridge University Press, 2019.

7.              T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Phys. Rept. 513, 1 (2012).

8.              C. M. Will, Living Rev. Rel. 17, 4 (2014).

9.              C. Lanczos, Annals Math. 39, 842-850 (1938).

10.           D. Lovelock, J. Math. Phys. 12, 498-501 (1971).
11.           D. G. Boulware and S. Deser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2656 (1985); J.T. Wheeler, Nucl. Phys.B 268 737 (1986).
12.           F.R. Tangherlini, Nouvo Cim. 27, 636 (1963).
13.           D. Glavan and C. Lin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081301 (2020).
14.           H. Lu, Y. Pang, Phys. Lett. B 809, 135717 (2020).
15.           W.Y. Ai, Commun. Theor. Phys. 72 (9), 095402 (2020); P.G.S. Fernandes, P. Carrilho, T. Clifton, D.J. Mulryne, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2), 024025 (2020); S. Mahapatra, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (10), 992  (2020); K. Aoki, M.A. Gorji, S. Mukohyama, Phys. Lett. B 810, 135843 (2020); T. Kobayashi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07, 013  (2020).
16.           R. Penrose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57 (1965).
17.           S. C. Jaryal and A. Chatterjee, Phys. Dark Univ. 39, 101171 (2023).
18.           A. Chatterjee,  A. Ghosh and S. C. Jaryal, Phys. Rev. D 106, no.4, 044049 (2022).


Related Images:



Author/Editor Information

Dr. Sanjay Kango

Department of Mathematics, Neta Ji Subhash Chander Bose Memorial, Government Post Graduate College, Hamirpur Himachal Pradesh-177 005, INDIA